Which of the following was NOT a problem associated with the Articles of Confederation?

Prepare for your TAMU HIST105 Exam with engaging study material. Access flashcards and multiple-choice questions complete with hints and explanations. Enhance your understanding of U.S. History!

The assertion that insufficient military forces was not a problem associated with the Articles of Confederation is accurate. Under the Articles, the federal government did not have the power to raise a standing army or directly command military forces, which meant that reliance on state militias became a significant issue. However, the primary concerns of the Articles revolved more around the lack of effective governance, economic stability, and diplomatic recognition rather than the sheer absence of military forces.

The government struggled to respond to national defense effectively, as each state retained its militia and control over its local forces, leading to a fragmented national defense strategy. Moreover, issues such as diplomatic humiliation arose when the United States struggled to assert itself internationally, particularly with nations like Britain and Spain, who were often uncooperative or dismissive due to the weakness of U.S. federal authority. Economic crises were also prevalent, as the government lacked the ability to levy taxes or regulate commerce effectively, leading to financial instability and widespread economic hardship. The phrase "a capital on the run" refers to instances like the movement of the Continental Congress to evade threats, reflecting the instability and vulnerabilities during this period.

Thus, while military issues were significant, they were more an outcome of the inadequacies of the Articles rather

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy