What interpretation of the Constitution did Thomas Jefferson advocate for?

Thomas Jefferson advocated for a strict interpretation of the Constitution, which means that he believed the federal government should exercise only those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution. Jefferson feared that a loose interpretation could lead to an overreach of federal authority and the potential erosion of states’ rights and individual liberties.

This perspective was particularly evident in Jefferson's opposition to the creation of the National Bank, which he argued was not explicitly authorized by the Constitution. Jefferson's strict constructionism stemmed from his commitment to a more limited federal government and his belief that the Constitution should be interpreted narrowly, thereby restricting federal powers and ensuring that states retained significant authority.

This position was a key aspect of early American political debate, contrasting with figures like Alexander Hamilton, who supported a loose interpretation that allowed for broader federal powers to effectively address national issues. Jefferson's views thus laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about the balance of power between state and federal governments in the United States.